Stream: Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Topic: [isabelle] Behavior of configuration options in local the...


view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 14:04):

From: Dmitriy Traytel <traytel@inf.ethz.ch>
Dear all,

I was surprised by the fact that configuration options seem to be reset when closing a local target:

ML ‹
val foo = Attrib.setup_config_int @{binding foo} (K 6);

local_setup ‹fn lthy =>
let
val _ = Config.get lthy foo |> @{print}
val _ = Config.get (Config.put foo 7 lthy) foo |> @{print}
val _ = Config.get (Config.put foo 7 lthy |> Local_Theory.open_target |> snd) foo |> @{print}
val _ = Config.get (Config.put foo 7 lthy |> Local_Theory.open_target |> snd |> Local_Theory.close_target) foo |> @{print}
in
lthy
end

This prints
6
7
7
6.

I had expected the last one to be 7 as well. Is there a way to make the changes to configuration options persistent in this respect?

Thanks for any hints,
Dmitriy

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 14:05):

From: Makarius <makarius@sketis.net>
If you really mean persistent in the sense of local theory targets, the
declaration needs to be applied via Local_Theory.declaration -- this
corresponds to Isar commands like 'declare' or 'declaration'.

Nonetheless, there is a slightly odd detail above for updates of the
hypothetical context on the surface: Local_Theory.open_target ..
Local_Theory.close_target is more disruptive than it needs to be. This
can be explained from the historical situation of still not fully
consolidated Local_Theory.restore / Local_Theory.reset.

See also this NEWS entry for the coming release
(http://isabelle.in.tum.de/repos/isabelle/rev/aae510e9a698):

I will try to get rid of this extra Local_Theory.reset in
Local_Theory.close_target.

I will also try harder to motivate other people to eliminate remaining
uses of Local_Theory.restore / Local_Theory.reset from their own tools.

Lets see if we can finally sort this out for the coming release.

Makarius

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 14:37):

From: Dmitriy Traytel <traytel@inf.ethz.ch>
Hi Makarius,

sure, this is fine. We have a workaround not to rely on configuration options (but instead pass a Boolean flag around) for the problem I reported originally anyway.

Dmitriy


Last updated: Apr 24 2024 at 08:20 UTC