[isabelle] Contributing some Q&A to StackOverflow; please... · Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Stream: Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Topic: [isabelle] Contributing some Q&A to StackOverflow; please...

Email Gateway (Aug 19 2022 at 11:07):

From: Joachim Breitner <breitner@kit.edu>
Dear Christoph,

I’m not sure that this is a good idea. The reputation system in
StackOverflow is designed to reward questions and answers that are
useful to others; if one has to explicitly ask for reputation then maybe
StackOverflow is not the right medium for that.

Maybe your surly interesting advice would better be suited for a
Isabelle style guide like document?

But generally you are right that StackExchange is becoming a good forum
to get Isabelle advise, and it would be good if more Isabelle users
would follow it and more liberally distribute upvotes to genuine
questions and useful answers.

Greetings,
Joachim
signature.asc

Email Gateway (Aug 19 2022 at 11:07):

From: Christian Sternagel <c.sternagel@gmail.com>
On 05/19/2013 06:43 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:

Dear Christoph,

Am Samstag, den 18.05.2013, 23:29 +0100 schrieb Christoph LANGE:

StackOverflow is giving me, a first-time user, a hard time with this, as
I first need to gain some reputation in order to do such uncommon things
as making many posts in succession, answering my own questions, etc.
Could I therefore ask _you_ to give me some reputation?

I’m not sure that this is a good idea. The reputation system in
StackOverflow is designed to reward questions and answers that are
useful to others; if one has to explicitly ask for reputation then maybe
StackOverflow is not the right medium for that.

I agree with the above comment. However, I do not draw the same conclusion:

Maybe your surly interesting advice would better be suited for a
Isabelle style guide like document?

In my opinion it is completely okay to ask and answer questions
yourself (and indeed this is even encouraged in the faq of
stackoverflow). (And no need to justify this as part of the question.)
If your questions and answers are good, you will get reputation.

But generally you are right that StackExchange is becoming a good forum
to get Isabelle advise, and it would be good if more Isabelle users
would follow it and more liberally distribute upvotes to genuine
questions and useful answers.

Indeed, stackoverflow is better suited for certain kinds of questions
than the mailing list, and I hope that it attracts more users over time.
I don't see a need to be more liberal with upvotes ;) (those will come
with more users).

cheers

chris

Email Gateway (Aug 19 2022 at 11:07):

From: Christoph LANGE <math.semantic.web@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear Joachim, dear John,

thanks for your feedback and for your votes. You have helped me to
get started.

2013-05-19 10:43 Joachim Breitner:

I’m not sure that this is a good idea. The reputation system in
StackOverflow is designed to reward questions and answers that are
useful to others; if one has to explicitly ask for reputation then
maybe StackOverflow is not the right medium for that.

I agree – but I hope that, from looking at my questions and answers,
you won't say that they are not useful at all and thus don't deserve
any votes. All I was asking for was a small "start-up loan" to be
able to do certain things on StackOverflow as a new user, such as
posting answers to my own questions. Today I can start paying it back ;-)

Maybe your surly interesting advice would better be suited for a
Isabelle style guide like document?

Originally (around February) I had been thinking of contributing this
stuff to the wiki, but the discussion on this list then encouraged me
to give StackOverflow a try instead. And StackOverflow actually
encourages answering your own questions:
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/07/its-ok-to-ask-and-answer-your-own-questions/.

But generally you are right that StackExchange is becoming a good
forum to get Isabelle advise, and it would be good if more Isabelle
users would follow it and more liberally distribute upvotes to
genuine questions and useful answers.

Your (and others') posts in response to mine seem to prove, in a way,
that at least I managed to disguise my contributions as "genuine
questions" ;-)

Cheers,

Christoph

Christoph Lange, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham
http://cs.bham.ac.uk/~langec/, Skype duke4701

→ Intelligent Computer Mathematics, 8–12 July, Bath, UK.
Work-in-progress deadline 7 June; http://cicm-conference.org/2013/
→ OpenMath Workshop, 10 July, Bath, UK.
Submission deadline 7 June; http://cicm-conference.org/2013/openmath/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlGYs1cACgkQvqg+op3jsjN9nACgyZdR+AQzAdFw4uLuHxVaFPwe
BdIAn1UaIKe6Q/YUKZ9V+Rh+Jygtmn+W
=eqsb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Email Gateway (Aug 19 2022 at 11:07):

From: Joachim Breitner <breitner@kit.edu>
Hi,

when I wrote the mail I only looked at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16629417 which I did not find very
great (though I do not agree with the closing of it).
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16629591 is much better, especially
as it is concrete enough that someone might find it when he is searching
for the relevant keywords.

Greetings,
Joachim
signature.asc

Email Gateway (Aug 19 2022 at 11:07):

From: Christoph LANGE <math.semantic.web@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

2013-05-19 12:38 Joachim Breitner:

when I wrote the mail I only looked at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16629417 which I did not find
very great

OK, I see.

(though I do not agree with the closing of it).

Another StackOverflow feature I need to learn about – let me try to
understand how that happened.

The FAQ (http://stackoverflow.com/faq#close) says questions can be
closed when they are "no real questions", which probably was the
reason here, and that they can be closed by "experienced community
members".

Are those "experienced community members" who close questions about
Isabelle likely to be experienced members of the _Isabelle_ community
(who understand why my question was "not very great", as you said), or
are these usually experienced members of StackOverflow in general, who
look at the general pattern of the question?

Cheers,

Christoph

Christoph Lange, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham
http://cs.bham.ac.uk/~langec/, Skype duke4701

iEYEARECAAYFAlGYvGkACgkQvqg+op3jsjN+6gCbBPBol28H7ctFiYVu4ww6S49I
KDkAmwaAhbLkck4ZPBud4/1iRRRhBoJE
=J3kS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Email Gateway (Aug 19 2022 at 11:08):

From: Christian Sternagel <c.sternagel@gmail.com>
On 05/19/2013 08:50 PM, Christoph LANGE wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

2013-05-19 12:38 Joachim Breitner:

when I wrote the mail I only looked at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16629417 which I did not find
very great

OK, I see.

(though I do not agree with the closing of it).

Another StackOverflow feature I need to learn about – let me try to
understand how that happened.

The FAQ (http://stackoverflow.com/faq#close) says questions can be
closed when they are "no real questions", which probably was the
reason here, and that they can be closed by "experienced community
members".

Are those "experienced community members" who close questions about
Isabelle likely to be experienced members of the _Isabelle_ community
(who understand why my question was "not very great", as you said), or
are these usually experienced members of StackOverflow in general, who
look at the general pattern of the question?
The latter. Thus questions are often closed for the wrong reasons.

cheers

chris

Cheers,

Christoph

Christoph Lange, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham
http://cs.bham.ac.uk/~langec/, Skype duke4701

→ Intelligent Computer Mathematics, 8–12 July, Bath, UK.
Work-in-progress deadline 7 June; http://cicm-conference.org/2013/
→ OpenMath Workshop, 10 July, Bath, UK.
Submission deadline 7 June; http://cicm-conference.org/2013/openmath/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlGYvGkACgkQvqg+op3jsjN+6gCbBPBol28H7ctFiYVu4ww6S49I
KDkAmwaAhbLkck4ZPBud4/1iRRRhBoJE
=J3kS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Last updated: Nov 21 2024 at 12:39 UTC