Stream: Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Topic: [isabelle] Generalized version of wf_map_prod_image


view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:18):

From: "Kasper F. Brandt" <poizan@poizan.dk>
Hello list
I wrote this generalization of wf_map_prod_image that only requires the
mapping to be injective on the the subset present in the relation.

lemma wf_map_prod_image':
fixes r:: "('a × 'a) set"
and f:: "'a ⇒ 'b"
assumes wf_r: "wf r"
and inj: "inj_on f (fst r ∪ snd r)"
shows "wf (map_prod f f r)" unfolding wf_eq_minimal proof (clarify) fix Q::"'b set" and x::"'b" assume x_mem: "x ∈ Q" let "?Q'" = "{p. f p ∈ Q ∧ p ∈ (fst r ∪ snd ` r)}"

show "∃z∈Q. ∀y. (y, z) ∈ map_prod f f r ⟶ y ∉ Q" proof (rule case_split) assume ex_fp_Q: "∃p. f p ∈ Q ∧ p ∈ (fst r ∪ snd r)" obtain z0 where z0_mem: "z0∈?Q'" and *: "∀y. (y, z0) ∈ r ⟶ y ∉ ?Q'" using ex_fp_Q wf_r[unfolded wf_eq_minimal, rule_format, of _ ?Q'] by blast have **: "⋀y z. (y,z) ∈ r ⟹ y ∈ (fst r ∪ snd r) ∧ z ∈ (fst r ∪
snd r) " by (metis Domain.intros Domain_fst Range.RangeI Range_snd Un_iff) have "∀y. (y, f z0) ∈ map_prod f f r ⟶ y ∉ Q"
proof (intro allI impI)
fix y
assume "(y, f z0) ∈ map_prod f f r" then obtain y' and ya where y'_ya_def: "(y, f z0) = (f y', f ya)" and y'_ya_rel: "(y', ya) ∈ r" using prod_fun_imageE by blast have "f z0 ∈ Q ∧ z0 ∈ fst r ∪ snd r" using z0_mem by blast moreover have "f y' = y ∧ f ya = f z0" using y'_ya_def by fastforce ultimately have "ya = z0" using "**" y'_ya_rel inj inj_onD by metis then show "y ∉ Q" using "*" "**" Pair_inject y'_ya_def y'_ya_rel by blast qed then show "∃z∈Q. ∀y. (y, z) ∈ map_prod f f r ⟶ y ∉ Q"
using z0_mem by blast
next
assume not_ex_fp_Q: "∄p. f p ∈ Q ∧ p ∈ (fst r ∪ snd r)"
then have "⋀p . f p ∈ Q ⟹ p ∉ fst r ∧ p ∉ snd r"
by blast
then have "⋀z y. z ∈ Q ⟹ (y, z) ∉ map_prod f f ` r"
by force
then show ?thesis using x_mem by auto
qed
qed

Would it make sense to add this to Wellfounded.thy, or replace the existing
one? I'll note that this should follow from wf_map_prod_image by defining a
type from the subset present in the relation, but I don't know Isabelle
well enough to know how easy it is to prove this version from it. If
nothing else this version is written in Isar style while wf_map_prod_image is
currently in apply-script style (I haven't checked Isabelle 2018)

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:18):

From: Tobias Nipkow <nipkow@in.tum.de>
Thanks for the input. It looks helpful and I will take care of it.

Tobias
smime.p7s

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:20):

From: Tobias Nipkow <nipkow@in.tum.de>
A generalized version of the thm due to Andrei Popescu is in now:

http://isabelle.in.tum.de/repos/isabelle/rev/80df7c90e315

Thanks to both of you.
Tobias
smime.p7s


Last updated: Nov 21 2024 at 12:39 UTC