Stream: Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Topic: [isabelle] Proof failed using rules


view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 13:10):

From: Stephy Wong <s.wong.731@googlemail.com>
Hi,

I have a rather basic problem and hope someone could help me out.

I have no idea why the following fails:

axioms Ax1 [rule_format] : "!! x y z. (y = Foo(z)) = (gn_inj_Int(Bar(x, y))

' 0'"

theorem t: "!! x y. gn_inj_Int(Bar(x, Foo(y))) >' 0"
using Ax1
by auto

Since Ax1 says that (gn_inj_Int(Bar(x, y)) >' 0 if and only if the second
argument of Bar is Foo(z), then how come t can't be proved?

Any help will be appreciated.

Regards,
Steph

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 13:10):

From: Tobias Nipkow <nipkow@in.tum.de>
Just like simp, auto uses equations only in the left-to-right direction.

Tobias

PS you don't need any of the !! or the [rule_format].

Stephy Wong schrieb:


Last updated: Nov 21 2024 at 12:39 UTC