Stream: Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Topic: [isabelle] Termination of Recursive Function with Set Com...


view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 19 2022 at 10:29):

From: Tjark Weber <webertj@in.tum.de>
Hi,

Consider this (simplified) example of a recursive function whose
definition involves set comprehension:

function (sequential) f :: "nat ⇒ nat" where
"f 0 = 1"
| "f n = ∑{f k | k. k < n}"
by pat_completeness auto

How to prove termination? In particular,

termination f
apply (relation "measure id")

results in an unprovable goal.

Best regards,
Tjark

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 19 2022 at 10:29):

From: Johannes Hölzl <hoelzl@in.tum.de>
Hi Tjark and Lars,

You need a congruence rule not for setsum but for {f k | k. k< n} which
is conjunction. A simple solution is to rewrite the rule with the image
operator, it already has the correct fundef-cong rule installed:

function (sequential) f :: "nat ⇒ nat" where
"f 0 = 1"
| "f n = ∑(f ` {..< n})"
by pat_completeness auto

termination by lexicographic_order

With

declare rev_conj_cong[fundef_cong]

your version also works.

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 19 2022 at 10:29):

From: Tjark Weber <webertj@in.tum.de>
Indeed it does. Many thanks!

Best regards,
Tjark


Last updated: Nov 21 2024 at 12:39 UTC