Stream: Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Topic: [isabelle] efficiency


view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 09:49):

From: Julien <julien@cs.uni-sb.de>
Hi All,

I am trying to prove a goal P knowing:

a implies P ; b implies P ; c implies P ; a \/ b \/ c

Each term a, b and c are of the form u /\ v.
The conclusion P is of the form u /\ (x \/ y \/ z ...).
But this should not matter for the proof.

With small formulae, auto or force work. But otherwise they both never
terminate.

Does anyone know what I should use instead of "auto" or "force" to solve
this kind of goal ?
I tried safe but it is not better.

Thanks a lot,
Julien

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 09:50):

From: Tjark Weber <tjark.weber@gmx.de>
Try

lemma "[| a --> P; b --> P; c --> P; a | b | c --> P |]" ==> P
by ((erule disjE)?, erule mp, assumption)+

Best,
Tjark

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 09:50):

From: Tobias Nipkow <nipkow@in.tum.de>
"blast" should do the job.

Tobias

Julien schrieb:


Last updated: Nov 21 2024 at 12:39 UTC