Stream: Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Topic: [isabelle] introducing local names in proofs


view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 17:18):

From: Lawrence Paulson <lp15@cam.ac.uk>
The right way is to use a structured proof, where you have elements such as

def a \<equiv> "x+y+z"

and

let ?a = "x+y+z"

The former must be expanded explicitly, while the latter are mere abbreviations and expand automatically.

Larry Paulson

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 17:28):

From: Viorel Preoteasa <viorel.preoteasa@abo.fi>
Hello,

In a proof I need to introduce some local names.
something like: a = x+y+z, b = a + x, ...
apply (subgoal_tac "\<exists> a b: a = x+y+z /\ b = a + x")
but this is simplified away by simp or safe.

Is there a way to achieve this goal?

Best regards,

Viorel


Last updated: Nov 21 2024 at 12:39 UTC