Stream: Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Topic: [isabelle] parsing strings


view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:48):

From: Jeremy Dawson <Jeremy.Dawson@anu.edu.au>
Hi,

if I have a file called test (simplified for the purposes of this
email), containing

length (String.explode ("Meta_Language.\\")) ;

length (String.explode ("Meta_Language.\\<M>_type.Type")) ;

and I type use "test" into the console process
(ie, isabelle console)
it gives the following error (relating to the second of the two
non-empty lines above)

SML lexical error: bad escape character in string (line 6 of "test") at
\<M>_type.Typ ...

On the other hand, if I paste those lines into the console process, they
work fine,

What is happening here?

Cheers,

Jeremy

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:48):

From: Makarius <makarius@sketis.net>
See again the "implementation" manual, about text and Isabelle symbols.

In Isabelle/ML you should hardly ever use Char and String operations
from SML'97, they are semantically wrong and cause unexpected behaviour.

Makarius

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:49):

From: Makarius <makarius@sketis.net>
See specifically "implementation", sections 0.6, 0.7.1, 0.7.2, and note
that "isabelle console" and "isabelle process" don't give you an
Isabelle/ML toplevel, only the raw Poly/ML bootstrap environment.
Normally you use the latter only to invoke things in a proper Isabelle
context, say via use_thy with Isabelle/ML inside it.

The most relevant operation on Isabelle symbol strings is Symbol.explode.

Side-remark: if you want to work with embedded languages in Isabelle,
the cartouche notation provides more flexibility. It corresponds to type
Input.source with main operation Input.explode_source, e.g.

ML ‹val inp = Input.source_explode ‹abcαβγ›;›

This gives you Isabelle symbols with precise position information. You
can use that with Isabelle scanner combinators to build a parser that
works with the Prover IDE, e.g. see ~~/src/Pure/Tools/rail.ML

People attending FLoC 2018 at Oxford can hear more about this at my talk
on Saturday, at the F-IDE workshop (Formal IDE).

Makarius

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:49):

From: Jeremy Dawson <Jeremy.Dawson@anu.edu.au>
Well, thanks - I gather from all of this that

val s = "\\<M>" ;
String.explode s ;
Symbol.explode s ;

the string s is treated as a single symbol in Isabelle.

However in the sections you quote I don't find anything to explain why I
can enter the text above into the console, but when the above code is
put into a file which I then use, it causes an error.

Incidentally, re your remark about "isabelle console", there used to be
Isar.loop () which would get you into an Isar parser - what has happened
to that? Is there an equivalent to that now?

Regards,

Jeremy

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:49):

From: Makarius <makarius@sketis.net>
On 11.07.2018 02:45, Jeremy Dawson wrote:

Well, thanks - I gather from all of this that

val s = "\\<M>" ;
String.explode s ;
Symbol.explode s ;

the string s is treated as a single symbol in Isabelle.

However in the sections you quote I don't find anything to explain why I
can enter the text above into the console, but when the above code is
put into a file which I then use, it causes an error.

This is due to a subtle difference (explained in the manual) how
Isabelle treats text, with its own notation for infinitely many symbol.
This also applies to Isabelle/ML as one of the many sublanguages of
Isabelle.

On the "isabelle console" you get the raw SML environment of Poly/ML,
but Isabelle/ML is not SML. It is better to avoid that -- you only need
it for rare invocations of use_thy in exotic debugging situations.

Normal Isabelle/ML development happens always in the Prover IDE -- it
saves a lot of time.

Incidentally, re your remark about "isabelle console", there used to be
Isar.loop () which would get you into an Isar parser - what has happened
to that? Is there an equivalent to that now?

Isar.loop has become a historic footnote, see the blog entry from
31-Oct-2014:
https://sketis.net/2014/discontinuation-of-isabelle-proof-general

There is no equivalent of it left: it has been superseded by the PIDE
document model in all respects.

If you need quasi-command-line access to PIDE, you can use the new
Isabelle server of Isabelle2018, see the blob entry
https://sketis.net/2018/the-isabelle-server-responsive-control-of-prover-sessions

Note that this is mainly relevant for accessing Isabelle from other
programs, alternative front-ends etc.

Makarius

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:50):

From: Jeremy Dawson <Jeremy.Dawson@anu.edu.au>
On 07/12/2018 08:13 AM, Makarius wrote:

On 11.07.2018 02:45, Jeremy Dawson wrote:

Well, thanks - I gather from all of this that

val s = "\\<M>" ;
String.explode s ;
Symbol.explode s ;

the string s is treated as a single symbol in Isabelle.

However in the sections you quote I don't find anything to explain why I
can enter the text above into the console, but when the above code is
put into a file which I then use, it causes an error.

This is due to a subtle difference (explained in the manual) how
Isabelle treats text, with its own notation for infinitely many symbol.
This also applies to Isabelle/ML as one of the many sublanguages of
Isabelle.

Hi Makarius,

Which bit of the manual, exactly, explains this?

I understand that it treats \<M> as a single symbol, but here we have
that it is simply rejected. I don't see any explanation of that.

Cheers,

Jeremy

On the "isabelle console" you get the raw SML environment of Poly/ML,
but Isabelle/ML is not SML. It is better to avoid that -- you only need
it for rare invocations of use_thy in exotic debugging situations.

Normal Isabelle/ML development happens always in the Prover IDE -- it
saves a lot of time.

Incidentally, re your remark about "isabelle console", there used to be
Isar.loop () which would get you into an Isar parser - what has happened
to that?  Is there an equivalent to that now?

Isar.loop has become a historic footnote, see the blog entry from
31-Oct-2014:
https://sketis.net/2014/discontinuation-of-isabelle-proof-general

There is no equivalent of it left: it has been superseded by the PIDE
document model in all respects.

If you need quasi-command-line access to PIDE, you can use the new
Isabelle server of Isabelle2018, see the blob entry
https://sketis.net/2018/the-isabelle-server-responsive-control-of-prover-sessions

Note that this is mainly relevant for accessing Isabelle from other
programs, alternative front-ends etc.

Makarius

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 22 2022 at 17:50):

From: Makarius <makarius@sketis.net>
The normal Isabelle text representation of lists of symbols means that
\\<M> is a backslash followed by \<M> but that is not a valid escape
sequence for ML string-literals.

In contrast, the raw Standard ML toplevel loop of "isabelle console"
treats it as escaped backslash followed by < M > characters.

Normally you can work uniformly with the Isabelle symbol text view, and
there is no need to refer to the raw toplevel loop, apart from invoking
something like use_thy from there.

Makarius


Last updated: Nov 21 2024 at 12:39 UTC