Stream: Archive Mirror: Isabelle Users Mailing List

Topic: [isabelle] typesetting compound subscripts


view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 11:20):

From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Dear Isabelle,

How is it possible to introduce typeset syntax with compound
subscripts? For example, given an indexed family "tos" of relations,
where I currently write

(t1,t2) \<in> tos n

I'd like to write something that will be typeset roughly as the LaTeX

t1 \leq_{tos n} t2

(Here tos is a bound variable, not something introduced by a consts, if that makes any difference.)

My attempts have all failed miserably (except when the subscript is a
single-character identifier), trying various combinations of Isabelle
syntax and translations declarations, definitions of \isactrlfoo's,
and \<^bsub>...\<^esub>.

many thanks,
Peter

example:

types t = "string"
types indexed_orders = "nat \<Rightarrow> (t*t) set"

constdefs
mytest :: "indexed_orders \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> t \<Rightarrow> t \<Rightarrow> bool"

"mytest tos n t1 t2 == (t1,t2) \<in> tos n"

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 11:23):

From: Stefan Berghofer <berghofe@in.tum.de>
Peter Sewell wrote:
Dear Peter,

this could be achieved by introducing an abbreviation mapping

x \<le>\<^bsub>R\<^esub> y

to

(x, y) \<in> R

as shown in the attached theory file. Note that this abbreviation will
affect all terms of the form "(x, y) \<in> R", which for example means
that also the intoduction rules for the transitive closure are printed
using this syntax.

Greetings,
Stefan
Peter.thy

view this post on Zulip Email Gateway (Aug 18 2022 at 11:23):

From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Many thanks!

Part of my confusion was the difference between what happens when
Isabelle typesets constdefs at the top level of a .thy file, and what
happens when it pretty-prints quoted theorems, as in your @{thm
[display] mytest_def [no_vars]}. At present I'm using the former, to
get some control over the layout of big formulas, and to include
comments in them. Am I right in (now) guessing that to get the intended
typesetting I therefore have to use the verbose syntax explicitly,
e.g. something like this:

constdefs
mytest3 :: "indexed_orders \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> t \<Rightarrow> t \<Rightarrow> bool"
"mytest3 tos n t1 t2 == (t1 \<le>\<^bsub> tos n \<^esub> t2)"

ie, there's no way to have the abbreviation automatically applied?

ta,
Peter


Last updated: Nov 21 2024 at 12:39 UTC