What logarithm functions are provided by standard sessions like HOL
, HOL-Library
, and HOL-Analysis
? There’s log
, but I can’t even get ln
.
And, more generally, how could I find this out myself? Search by browsing through https://isabelle.in.tum.de/library/HOL/index.html
needs quite some good guessing to be efficient, and automated search with https://search.isabelle.in.tum.de/
shows 920 hits when entering log
.
On search.isabelle.in.tum.de you should use the filters to narrow down the search results (cf the examples page on the website)
In your case, you could start with a search for "semantic entitty name" of "log" or "ln": https://search.isabelle.in.tum.de/#search/default_Isabelle2021_AFP2021?page=%5B%5D&q=%7B%22fields%22%3A%5B%7B%22field%22%3A%22Name%22%2C%22match%22%3A%22OneOf%22%2C%22terms%22%3A%5B%22ln%22%2C%22log%22%5D%7D%5D%2C%22facets%22%3A%7B%22Kind%22%3A%5B%22Constant%22%5D%7D%7D
and if that's still too much, further refine based on the type, removing one of "ln" or "log" etc.
or maybe a concept-based search on serapis works better for you if you have some further context.
Thanks a lot. That was of great help.
Wolfgang Jeltsch has marked this topic as resolved.
Wolfgang Jeltsch said:
What logarithm functions are provided by standard sessions like
HOL
,HOL-Library
, andHOL-Analysis
? There’slog
, but I can’t even getln
.And, more generally, how could I find this out myself? Search by browsing through
https://isabelle.in.tum.de/library/HOL/index.html
needs quite some good guessing to be efficient, and automated search withhttps://search.isabelle.in.tum.de/
shows 920 hits when enteringlog
.
Wait, what do you mean you ‘can't get ln’? The ln
function is defined in HOL. The log
function is even defined in terms of ln
. You just have to remember to import Complex_Main
instead of Main
if you want to use it. (but if you use HOL-Analysis, that imports Complex_Main
anyway).
ln
is defined in its own type class ln
. There is an instantiation for real
where ln x
is undefined for non-positive x
in the sense that ∀x<0. ln x = c
for some constant c
that we know nothing about. And there is an instantiation for complex
in HOL-Analysis
, where ln 0
is undefined and otherwise ln z
is the principal branch of the logarithm, i.e. the unique w
such that and .
Manuel Eberl said:
Wait, what do you mean you ‘can't get
ln
’?
I got this wrong. For checking whether a constant of a certain name is available, I typically write term ⟨name⟩
, and when Isabelle shows ⟨name⟩ :: 'a
, I know it’s not available (of course, this isn’t entirely safe, as in particular undefined
does have type 'a
). In the case of ln
, Isabelle showed me ln :: 'a ⇒ 'a
, and I just saw the type variable and immediately thought ln
doesn’t exist. A problem here is that Isabelle doesn’t show a type like 'a::⟨some_class⟩ ⇒ 'a
in such cases.
You could enable show_sorts
for that: https://isabelle.in.tum.de/doc/isar-ref.pdf#attribute.show-sorts
There is also find_consts
. And if the variable is shown in black (instead of blue), then it is not free so you know that it is already defined (you can then also Ctrl+Click to go to the definition).
Well, find_consts
isn’t about showing sorts for given constants, but about finding constants by type, right? How would you find ln
by type? There are zillions of functions that have the same type, and maybe you would even have to know its most general type, which would require to know a fair bit of the class structure of the standard library.
The constant being shown in black vs. blue is, of course, a viable solution.
You can find ln
by name with find_consts
:
find_consts name: "ln"
Of course you have to have it imported somewhere for that to work.
Sure. However, that was not my point. My point was that, as I assumed, find_consts
could search by type only. I just didn’t know about the name:
argument. Thanks for showing me that.
Last updated: Dec 30 2024 at 16:22 UTC