Hi,
shouldn't the goal be solved directly by the two assumptions?
I struggle understanding the current "problem" :-)
using this:
?x ∈ E ⟹ t ?x = Some ?y ⟶ ?y ∈ V
?x ∉ E ⟹ t ?x = None
goal (1 subgoal):
1. ran t = V
You can only have the goal solved by assumption if the goal is literally one of the assumptions, which in your example it’s apparently not.
In fact, the goal does not even follow from the assumptions. Consider the situation where t x
is None
for every x
. Then both assumptions are true independently of V
, but the goal would be equivalent to V = {}
.
Robert Soeldner has marked this topic as resolved.
Last updated: Dec 30 2024 at 16:22 UTC