Stream: Beginner Questions

Topic: How to define the range lemma like star in Isabelle entry


view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 21 2023 at 19:54):

Based on the repositoy in AFP, I plan to extend the library of regexp in Isabelle. Here I try to prove the range regexp in below which is similay to star.

The index of star could start from zero(empty list) to infinite. The range starts from nat m to nat n. But I have no idea that figure out a solution like lemma in_star_iff_concat(i.e. use the list to denote the procedure).

Any helps would be appreciated.

type_synonym 'a lang = "'a list set"

definition conc :: "'a lang ⇒ 'a lang ⇒ 'a lang" (infixr "@@" 75) where
"A @@ B = {xs@ys | xs ys. xs:A & ys:B}"

overloading lang_pow == "compow :: nat ⇒ 'a lang ⇒ 'a lang"
begin
  primrec lang_pow :: "nat ⇒ 'a lang ⇒ 'a lang" where
  "lang_pow 0 A = {[]}" |
  "lang_pow (Suc n) A = A @@ (lang_pow n A)"
end

definition lang_pow :: "nat ⇒ 'a lang ⇒ 'a lang" where
  lang_pow_code_def [code_abbrev]: "lang_pow = compow"

lemma [code]:
  "lang_pow (Suc n) A = A @@ (lang_pow n A)"
  "lang_pow 0 A = {[]}"
  by (simp_all add: lang_pow_code_def)


definition star :: "'a lang ⇒ 'a lang" where
"star A = (⋃n. A ^^ n)"


definition range :: "'a lang ⇒ nat ⇒ nat => 'a lang " where
"range A m n= (⋃i∈{m..n}. A ^^ i)"


lemma concat_in_star: "set ws ⊆ A ⟹ concat ws : star A"
  by(induct ws) simp_all


lemma in_star_iff_concat:
  "w ∈ star A = (∃ws. set ws ⊆ A ∧ w = concat ws)"
  (is "_ = (∃ws. ?R w ws)")
proof
  assume "w : star A" thus "∃ws. ?R w ws"
  proof induct
    case Nil have "?R [] []" by simp
    thus ?case ..
  next
    case (append u v)
    then obtain ws where "set ws ⊆ A ∧ v = concat ws" by blast
    with append have "?R (u@v) (u#ws)" by auto
    thus ?case ..
  qed
next
  assume "∃us. ?R w us" thus "w : star A"
  by (auto simp: concat_in_star)
qed

lemma try_range :"w : range A m n = (...)"
sorry

view this post on Zulip Lukas Stevens (May 22 2023 at 12:57):

You could use drop and take or state that w' ∈ A and w' = as @ w @ bs and length as = n /\ length w = m - n

view this post on Zulip Lukas Stevens (May 22 2023 at 13:27):

More concretely, w ∈ range A n m ⟺ (∃w' ∈ A. w' = as @ w @ bs ∧ length as = n ∧ length w = m - n)

view this post on Zulip Mathias Fleury (May 22 2023 at 13:37):

For the future, please mention that you also asked on SO

view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 22 2023 at 19:04):

Okay, I will do that. Thx. The issue was also asked on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76301672/how-to-define-the-range-lemma-like-star.

view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 22 2023 at 19:13):

Sorry for that I am new comer in Isabelle. What is w' used for? If there is complete proof, that will be better to understand.

view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 22 2023 at 19:24):

I try to prove such lemma here:lemma "w : range1 A m n = (∃ws. set ws ⊆ A ∧ w = concat ws ∧ length ws ≤ n ∧ length ws ≥ m)" (is "_ = (∃ws. ?R w ws)")

view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 22 2023 at 19:26):

where ∃ws. set ws ⊆ A ∧ w = concat ws ∧ length ws ≤ n ∧ m ≤ length ws ⟹ w ∈ range1 A m n was proved by below,

lemma concat_Suc_contains:"concat ws ∈ range1 A m n ⟹ concat ws ∈ range1 A m (Suc n)"
  apply(induct ws)
  apply simp
   apply (meson element_range1 le_Suc_eq)
  apply simp
  by (meson element_range1 le_Suc_eq)

lemma concat_n_times:"set ws ⊆ A ⟹ concat ws ∈ A ^^ length ws"
  apply(induct ws)
   apply simp
  apply simp
  done

lemma concat_in_range1: "set ws ⊆ A ∧ length ws ≥ m ∧ length ws ≤ n ⟹ concat ws : range1 A m n"
  apply(induct n)
  subgoal
   apply simp
    using zero_range1_empty apply fastforce
    done
  apply(case_tac "length ws ≤ n")
  subgoal for n apply simp
    by(simp add:concat_Suc_contains)
  subgoal for n apply simp apply(case_tac "length ws = (Suc n)")
     prefer 2
    subgoal
      apply simp
      done
    subgoal apply simp
      by (metis dual_order.refl element_range1 concat_n_times)
  done
  done

But w ∈ range1 A m n ⟹ ∃ws. set ws ⊆ A ∧ w = concat ws ∧ length ws ≤ n ∧ m ≤ length ws was still stuck.

view this post on Zulip Mathias Fleury (May 22 2023 at 20:24):

I gave it a try, and there is no Isabelle problem here, just a "how do you do this on paper"?

view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 22 2023 at 20:29):

I can't figure out the proof of w ∈ range1 A m n ⟹ ∃ws. set ws ⊆ A ∧ w = concat ws ∧ length ws ≤ n ∧ m ≤ length ws, maybe induct on w. I am still trying.

view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 22 2023 at 20:41):

It seems that the forward lemma is not correct, I don't know...

lemma zero_range1_empty:"[] ∈ range1 A 0 n"
  apply(simp add:range1_def)
  apply(induct n)
   apply simp
  apply auto
  done

lemma element_range1:"b :range1 A m n = (∃i. i ≥ m ∧ i ≤ n ∧ b : A ^^ i)"
  apply(simp add:range1_def)
  using atLeastAtMost_iff by blast

lemma concat_Suc_contains:"concat ws ∈ range1 A m n ⟹ concat ws ∈ range1 A m (Suc n)"
  apply(induct ws)
  apply simp
   apply (meson element_range1 le_Suc_eq)
  apply simp
  by (meson element_range1 le_Suc_eq)

lemma concat_n_times:"set ws ⊆ A ⟹ concat ws ∈ A ^^ length ws"
  apply(induct ws)
   apply simp
  by simp

lemma concat_in_range1: "set ws ⊆ A ∧ length ws ≥ m ∧ length ws ≤ n ⟹ concat ws : range1 A m n"
  apply(induct n)
  subgoal
   apply simp
    using zero_range1_empty by fastforce
  apply(case_tac "length ws ≤ n")
  subgoal for n apply simp
    by(simp add:concat_Suc_contains)
  subgoal for n
    apply simp apply(case_tac "length ws = (Suc n)")
     prefer 2
    subgoal
      by simp
    subgoal apply simp
      by (metis dual_order.refl element_range1 concat_n_times)
  done
  done

lemma non_range1[simp]:"range1 A 0 0 = {[]}"
  apply(simp add:range1_def)
  done

lemma conc_range1[simp]:"range1 A 0 (Suc n) =  (range1 A 0 n) ∪ A ^^ (Suc n)"
  apply (simp add:range1_def)
  by (simp add: atLeast0_atMost_Suc inf_sup_aci(5))

lemma in_range_iff_concat:"w : range1 A m n = (∃ws. set ws ⊆ A ∧ w = concat ws ∧ length ws ≤ n ∧ length ws ≥ m)"
  (is "_ = (∃ws. ?R w ws)")
proof
  assume "w : range1 A m n" thus "∃ws. ?R w ws"
    sorry
next
  assume "∃us. ?R w us" thus "w : range1 A m n"
    apply auto
    by(simp add:concat_in_range1)
qed

view this post on Zulip Mathias Fleury (May 23 2023 at 04:54):

Unfolding range1 gives you a p such that p \in A^^p and m <= p and p <= n. Induction on p makes a lot more sense…

view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 23 2023 at 07:34):

Ahh, I see.

view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 23 2023 at 07:43):

Sorry for the noob, what about the lemma " w ∈ A ^^ x ==> ∃ws. set ws ⊆ A ∧ w = concat ws ∧ length ws = x", when induct on p. It's very crucial.

view this post on Zulip Hongjian Jiang (May 23 2023 at 14:37):

Okay, I solved it. Thx a lot. Mathias.


Last updated: Dec 21 2024 at 16:20 UTC