Stream: Beginner Questions

Topic: Specifying simprocs


view this post on Zulip Matt Griffin (May 25 2023 at 22:12):

Is there a way to limit the simplifier to a single simproc, in my case fun_upd2? I understand that I can specify a list of theorems and omit all others with only but this doesn't seem to extend to simproc(s). IE: `simp only: fun_upd2' fails with "Undefined fact".

view this post on Zulip Mathias Fleury (May 26 2023 at 04:51):

It is hard to recommend. The ML version:

  apply (tactic ‹ALLGOALS (Simplifier.simp_tac (empty_simpset @{context} addsimprocs [\<^simproc>‹fun_upd2›]))›)

Better is probably the "one simproc is going rogue, let's deactivate it":

  using  [[simproc del: fun_upd2]]

view this post on Zulip Matt Griffin (May 26 2023 at 15:17):

Mathias Fleury said:

It is hard to recommend. The ML version:

  apply (tactic ‹ALLGOALS (Simplifier.simp_tac (empty_simpset @{context} addsimprocs [\<^simproc>‹fun_upd2›]))›)

Better is probably the "one simproc is going rogue, let's deactivate it":

  using  [[simproc del: fun_upd2]]

Thanks for this. For context, I needed to run fun_upd2 to simplify a very large map structure with repeating keys and the simp method took too long (mainly due to arith_simps/rel_simps which would persist even with "del:"). Unfortunately, the ML version you suggested doesn't solve the speed issue but I think I understand why. Looking at the definition of fun_upd2 it invokes the simplifier in the last step of "Goal.prove".

Goal.prove ctxt [] [] (Logic.mk_equals (t, rhs))
              (fn _ =>
                resolve_tac ctxt [eq_reflection] 1 THEN
                resolve_tac ctxt @{thms ext} 1 THEN
                simp_tac (put_simpset ss ctxt) 1)

Is there any way I can limit the simpset in this call, or alternately pass the goal back to the caller to solve?

view this post on Zulip Mathias Fleury (May 26 2023 at 15:29):

I think that this is only doing the rewriting and should not be the cause of your problem

view this post on Zulip Mathias Fleury (May 26 2023 at 15:30):

can you try

  supply[[simp_trace, simp_debug]]

to see if there is something weird?

view this post on Zulip Matt Griffin (May 26 2023 at 18:13):

I had to extend the simp_trace_depth_limit to get meaningful results

using [[simp_trace, simp_debug, simp_trace_depth_limit=40]]  apply (tactic ‹ALLGOALS (Simplifier.simp_tac (empty_simpset @{context} addsimprocs [\<^simproc>‹fun_upd2›]))›)[1]

Seems to produce output as I would expect. I guess rewriting for such a large map takes time. I am able to prove the goal much faster than the rewriting rule using a custom proof method (my use case can make a number of assumptions fun_upd2 cannot) so I've added my own simproc goal. Thank you for the help.


Last updated: Dec 21 2024 at 16:20 UTC