From: Tobias Nipkow <nipkow@in.tum.de>
More on logic and algebra:
A Variant of the Superposition Calculus
Nicolas Peltier
We provide a formalization of a variant of the superposition calculus, together 
with formal proofs of soundness and refutational completeness (w.r.t. the usual 
redundancy criteria based on clause ordering). This version of the calculus uses 
all the standard restrictions of the superposition rules, together with the 
following refinement, inspired by the basic superposition calculus: each clause 
is associated with a set of terms which are assumed to be in normal form -- thus 
any application of the replacement rule on these terms is blocked. The set is 
initially empty and terms may be added or removed at each inference step. The 
set of terms that are assumed to be in normal form includes any term introduced 
by previous unifiers as well as any term occurring in the parent clauses at a 
position that is smaller (according to some given ordering on positions) than a 
previously replaced term. The standard superposition calculus corresponds to the 
case where the set of irreducible terms is always empty.
https://www.isa-afp.org/entries/SuperCalc.shtml
Stone Algebras
Walter Guttmann
A range of algebras between lattices and Boolean algebras generalise the notion 
of a complement. We develop a hierarchy of these pseudo-complemented algebras 
that includes Stone algebras. Independently of this theory we study filters 
based on partial orders. Both theories are combined to prove Chen and Grätzer's 
construction theorem for Stone algebras. The latter involves extensive reasoning 
about algebraic structures in addition to reasoning in algebraic structures.
https://www.isa-afp.org/entries/Stone_Algebras.shtml
Enjoy!
smime.p7s
Last updated: Nov 04 2025 at 08:30 UTC